Best biography of aaron burr
•
From Publishers Weekly
Does Burr belong in the pantheon of founding fathers? Or is he, as historians have asserted ever since he fatally shot Alexander Hamilton in a duel, a faux founder who happened to be in the right place at the right time? Was he really the enigmatic villain, the political schemer who lacked any moral core, the sexual pervert, the cherubic-faced slanderer so beloved of popular imagination? This striking new biography by Isenberg (Sex and Citizenship in Antebellum America) argues that Burr was, indeed, the real thing, a founder "at the center of nation building" and a "capable leader in New York political circles." Interestingly, if controversially, Isenberg believes Burr was "the only founder to embrace feminism," the only one who "adhered to the ideal that reason should transcend party differences." Far from being an empty vessel, she says, Burr defended freedom of speech, wanted to expand suffrage and was a proponent of equal rights. Burr was not without his
•
Aaron Burr
Vice President of the United States from to
For other uses, see Aaron Burr (disambiguation).
Aaron Burr | |
---|---|
Portrait c. | |
In office March 4, – March 4, | |
President | Thomas Jefferson |
Preceded by | Thomas Jefferson |
Succeeded by | George Clinton |
In office March 4, – March 3, | |
Preceded by | Philip Schuyler |
Succeeded by | Philip Schuyler |
In office September 29, – November 8, | |
Governor | George Clinton |
Preceded by | Richard Varick |
Succeeded by | Morgan Lewis |
In office July 1, – June 30, | |
In office July 1, – June 30, | |
Born | Aaron Burr Jr. ()February 6, Newark, Province of New Jersey, British America |
Died | September 14, () (aged80) Staten Island, New York, U.S. |
Resting place | Princeton Cemetery |
Political party | Democratic-Republican |
Spouses |
|
Children | 10 or more, including Theodosia, John, and • He Was No Alexander HamiltonThe truth about most popular history, Nancy Isenberg writes in Fallen Founder, her new life of Aaron Burr,
Popular historians, in other words, are what Sir Herbert Butterfield called Whiggish in their approach to history. They look to the past to understand how countries such as Great Britain and the United States have come to enjoy the liberties that characterize their present life. Like Butterfield, Isenberg—the Mary Frances Barnard Chair in 19th-Century American History at the University of Tulsa—rejects Whig history as insufficiently attentive to the pastness of the p |